The Different Patient-derived Xenograft Models for Cancer Therapy

Many malignancies lack randomized data that can be used to guide systemic therapy. Even though gene expression profiling coupled with proteomics has improved diagnosis, classification, and prognosis, we cannot target many malignancies due to a lack of treatment alternatives. They are using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to generate rare cancers. The effectiveness of preclinical studies and correct clinical results are nearly always at odds. Better preclinical modeling is required for this. On occasion, conventional research methods such as randomized control trials may be used to assess the fast-expanding area of targeted, personalized treatment, which is the future of cancer practice. 

The Various Xenograft Models

According to biomarkers for predictive and prognostic cancers, clinical judgment and experience are more important than published clinical data in creating personalized cancer treatment. Below is a list of PDX Models for different malignancies.

Mixed Mullerian Cancer

Malignant neoplasms in the uterus consisting of epithelial and mesenchymal components have been discussed for over 150 years. They provided researchers with a reliable way to evaluate an agent’s efficacy before putting it through clinical trials. Appropriate preclinical models, such as mixed Mullerian cancer pdx models, are needed to assess medications that target mixed Mullerian cancers.

Prostate Cancer 

Prostate cancer is a very diverse and complicated illness that poses significant difficulties to medication development and biomedical research. Preclinical models such as patient-derived xenografts (PDX) must evaluate medications that primarily target prostate cancer. Prostate cancer PDXs are extremely difficult to develop. 

Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is one of the most frequent solid tumors in young men aged 20–40, and the prevalence is increasing globally. As the most excellent predictive preclinical model, PDX models are well-known for accurately predicting drug effectiveness before it is placed into clinical trials. These models may be utilized for mechanistic research and pre-clinical validation of new testicular cancer studies therapy methods.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia 

AML is a genetically heterogeneous cell cancer in myeloid hematopoiesis. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for blood cancer are often transitory and non-transferable between passages. They do not produce disease signs or cause death. Because PDX models for blood cancer are permanent, they may be used to investigate disease recurrence after a treatment challenge and the effectiveness of new medicines in treating drug-resistant cancers.

Brain Cancer 

While patient survival in pediatric oncology has improved in many areas in recent decades, the prognosis for most children with malignant brain tumors remains dull. Current pediatric brain tumor PDXs are created in immunosuppressed rats or mice by xenografting fresh tissue, newly obtained cell suspensions, or short-cropped neurospheres.


Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant general prognosis biliary system. Effective customized therapies for this fatal disease are urgently required. Biliary tumors are uncommon yet highly aggressive, with dismal survival outcomes. Their limited incidence has hampered effective treatment studies.



As biomarker-driven therapy has become increasingly important in the treatment of cancer patients, new trial designs for biomarker-identified patient groups have been developed. PDX models replicate pathohistological, genetic/epigenetic, and therapeutic responses to anti-cancer treatments in tumor tissue. PDX models can predict individual drug and treatment responses, allowing for personalized medicine. They’re used to infer a lot of the mechanisms that cause treatment resistance in different tumor kinds. However, tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and the potential for tumor cell proliferation are preserved. In organoid-derived PDX models, biofluorescence imaging may identify micrometastatic lesions.